Explained: How Kartik Tyagi Achieved The Impossible For The Rajasthan Royals With His Large Yorkers


The conventional yorker is a low momentum delivery that flows into the base of the stump. But with post-modern 360-degree pyrotechnicians on the prowl, Yorkers grew wider and wider from the stump into the shortest format, garnering considerable success, as did Kartik Tyagi, leader of the Rajasthan Royals in his last burglary in ages. The method involves risks, requires a high degree of precision and cadence, among other things, but gains popularity with death.

How did Tyagi perform wide yorkers?

It’s not like each of his six bullets landed in exactly the same spot, or that they were large Yorkers. The first ball was a low, full throw off the stump. The second landed on the full side of the correct length strip. The fifth was a wide, solid bullet that shaped a clue, which Deepak Hooda edged out. Only his third, fourth and sixth balls could be classified as wide Yorkers, or rather Yorkers away from the stumps. The third was thrown on the fifth-sixth strain line across the left, which Nicholas Pooran tried to stretch his bat and slide in front of the keeper, but played it so far from his body that he had little control. The fourth was the classic Great Yorkie, so far it almost hugged the streetcar line. Deepak Hooda expected the same at the next ball and therefore planned to skin him for cover. But Tyagi, while holding the line, took the length off a fraction and foxed it.

The last balloon, careful not to concede an unnecessary broad, it led the yorker closer to the stumps, in the fifth-sixth channel of the stump. So it’s not just blind bowling that has reaped its success, but the subtle change in its line, and in a few cases, its length as well.

What is the idea behind a great Yorker?

The main motive is to get the batsmen to catch the ball. The wide line automatically means he’s stretching for the ball (unless he’s preempted and has already decided to cross), usually by simply throwing his hands over it, playing so far from the body that his balance goes wrong. kilter. It’s hard to go under the ball and sculpt or cream it. It’s hard to get both power and precision, unless a batsman has really fast hands. It limits the scoring zones (the leg side is out of bounds) as well as the kills. There are only a few shots you can shoot – the beef, dab behind the rack, crack it, choke through the covers. Or the reverse sweep, which requires premeditation and comes with a greater margin of error, even in the best of circumstances. It works on the principle that the drummers need space, but not too much space that could destabilize their balance and stability.

What is the fundamental (and philosophical) difference between a conventional New Yorker and a New Yorker?

The conventional yorker was primarily designed as a wicket demolition machine, in all formats. Fast, furious, sneaking viciously, sometimes accentuated reversal, beating the toes and the bat if they intervened. Usually stars in lower order bangs in tests and death in ODIs, although some of its top dealers have used it with great success against traditional drummers in all formats. Conversely, the wide yorker is a restrictive and race denial ploy, largely confined to T20s. Some traditionalists even call it a negative ploy, likening it to the side-of-the-leg tactic against right-handed batsmen. The fields are similar. In the latter case, the leg side is stacked with defensive players; among large Yorkers, the offside is invariably packed.

However, a good Yorker of any lineage has similar traits. Both need a certain degree of accuracy, precision, sharpness and rhythm. In that sense, a Great Yorker is an even more difficult trick to achieve than the classic on a consistent basis.

What virtues does a bowler need?

Rhythm is everything, perhaps more so than the conventional version, where even medium rhythms could compensate for their lack of rhythm with precision and precision. Good drummers could still master the rhythm to their liking, but the lack of rhythm gives drummers more time and, therefore, alternatives. With the power at their disposal, from their beefy bats to their beefier shoulders, they could generate their own momentum. And a batsman, when reaching out, might have more control over his shots when looking to play straight rather than square. Mixing the lines is also necessary, as beaters could easily anticipate and prepare for the delivery.

Tyagi’s previous three overs had risen to 28. (Twitter / Rajasthan Royals)

Newsletter | Click for the best explanations of the day to your inbox

What are the risk factors in bowling players?

As the ball flirts with the tramline, there is the danger of a wide call. Unsurprisingly, so many Yorkers end up as extras on the scoresheet. But then there is a perception that in T20s, or death in ODISs, it is better to risk a wide than to miss length and get hit for a six. A little closer to the body, the batsmen could guide him in front of the goalkeeper. However, wasting lengths is more risky than missing lines. A little fuller, batsmen with fast feet could move around and choose their spots. If the pitcher is wrong on the shorter side, a good batsman could slide the ball to the side of the leg, where even if it tacks there is a good chance that it will fall safely, as it there are fewer defensive players. Slightly slower than 140 km / h, he has plenty of time to free his arms and swing the blade.

JOIN NOW: Express telegram chain explained

Do New Yorkers earn in foreign currency?

The variation predates the T20 era, but has always been an outlier. But in recent times it has gained popularity and acceptability. Over the past two editions, bowlers have used it frequently. Andre Russell is perhaps the best example; so was Kyle Jamieson. Lasith Malinga was the high priest and, alongside Nuwan Kulasekara, had smothered India with wide Yorkers at the back of the 2014 World T20 final. Many left-handed bowlers use it as well, their angle making the ball even more difficult. harder for right-handed hitters to detonate them.


About Author

Leave A Reply